Controlled TV airs ‘secret’ plans for nuclear weapon
The submarine would “defeat important economic objects of an enemy in coastal zones, bringing guaranteed and unacceptable losses on the country’s territory by forming a wide area of radioactive contamination incompatible with conducting military, economic or any other activities there for a long period of time”, it said.
On Tuesday evening, NTV television and Channel One state television, which are under strict Kremlin control, both featured footage from a meeting that President Vladimir Putin held with top defense officials in the southern Russian city of Sochi. In what observers are dismissing as a hackneyed piece of propaganda, the video, which aired on two channels heavily policed by the Kremlin, is being viewed as a deliberate mishap created to trouble the West.
“It is true a few secret data got into the shot, and it was subsequently deleted. We hope that this won’t happen again”, he said.
Russian Federation will counter NATO’s U.S.-led missile defense program by deploying new strike weapons capable of piercing the shield, President Vladimir Putin said Tuesday. The proposal was rejected, partly because naval technology of the era wouldnt allow a Soviet submarine to approach the USA shore undetected.
Therefore, the references to the Iranian and North Korean nuclear threats are only a cover for the U.S. true plans, the Russian president said.
According to the agreement, dubbed the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), the Islamic Republic will accept restrictions on its nuclear program in return for removal of sanctions imposed on Tehran by the U.S. and the European Union.
Pavel Felgenhauer, a Russian military analyst, also said the disclosure confirms the Free Beaconreporting on the Kanyon.
On the diagram the giant torpedo’s range is given as “up to 10,000km” (6,200 miles) and depth of trajectory is “up to 1,000m” (3,300ft).
That could be a kind of thermonuclear warhead having a layer of cobalt 59, which could be transmuted into cobalt 60 that is highly radioactive using a half life longer.
Mr explained the Western defence endeavor was “an effort to sabotage the existing equality in tactical nuclear weapons and basically to upset the entire system of worldwide and regional stability”.
Zelichenok says that in the response “we admit some things, we argue with some things, some are already fixed, it’s a variety”, but declined to provide further details, saying “it’s not for the press”. “This is the way they believe they could show their strength and resolve”.