Trump vows ‘extreme vetting’ of immigrants if elected

‘In addition to screening out all members or sympathizers of terrorist groups, we must also screen out any who have hostile attitudes towards our country or its principles – or who believe that Sharia law should supplant American law.

Donald Trump proposed a new kind of immigration policy to screen out immigrants who cater to radicalism, in a speech on Monday, in Youngstown, Ohio.

“We will have to temporarily suspend immigration from some of the most risky and volatile regions of the world that have a history of exporting terrorism”.

Trump said “the time is overdue” for better screening of extremists trying to enter the country, calling for “extreme vetting”.

But he didn’t say which countries or regions would be subject to the “extreme” vetting, and his announcement that government agencies would create the list suggested that would not happen before the election in November. And instead of a wholesale ban on Muslims he now calls for the “extreme vetting” of potential immigrants that should include an ideological screening test.

North Atlantic Treaty Organisation has been dealing with terrorism as an alliance since after the September 11, 2001, attacks on the US. Since my comments, they have changed their policy and now have a new division focused on terror threats, very good. Last week, 50 Republican foreign policy experts signed a statement saying they wouldn’t vote for Mr. Trump because they question his capacity to serve as commander in chief.

Indeed, the first-time candidate for elected office dominated newspaper headlines and TV news cycles for weeks with his proposal to ban all Muslims from entering the United States. Once again, he did not name those countries.

Donald Trump’s “extreme vetting” is as phony as he is.

“I was proud my son Beau – served for a year in Iraq”, Biden said. “Only those we expect to flourish in this country and to embrace a tolerant American society should be issued visas”. And second, his call for banning Muslims from entering the USA, made at the end of previous year.

Donald Trump was supposed to give a major speech Monday on his strategy for defeating the Islamic State and other terrorist groups. “We are still going to have to fight what has been an unrelenting negative campaign against her; that has made a dent in the opinion of people even, who are inclined to vote for her”.

Regarding diplomacy, Trump again stated his desire to develop a closer relationship with Russian Federation and its controversial and often standoffish leader, Vladimir Putin – another notion that’s drawn sharp criticisms from both sides of the aisle. “Wouldn’t that be a good thing?”, he said.

Hillary Clinton was the center of an on-stage attack during the speech when Trump stated that the Democrat lacks the “mental and physical stamina” to take on ISIS.

He went so far as to say North Atlantic Treaty Organisation would play an important role – even though he recently slammed allies that haven’t paid their dues, warning they wouldn’t be guaranteed help from the US if Russian Federation invaded. Isis has spread across the Middle East and into the west.

“I’ve got friends and family in America who are proud Americans, proud Muslims and he needs to recognize that he’s inadvertently playing into the hands of Daesh (Arabic acronym for Islamic State) or so-called ISIL and ISIS by giving the impression there is a clash between the West and mainstream Muslims”.