Democratic Rep. Nadler of New York to support Iran deal

“If it wasn’t such a serious matter, it would be nearly laughable”.

“Accordingly, I will support the agreement and vote against a Resolution of Disapproval”, Nadler added.

What happens to this deal really depends on Senate Democrats.

Sen. Graham is right to sound the alarm about the alleged agreement by IAEA to allow Iran to inspect its own sites. The AP also released a transcript of the draft agreement on which the news report was based.

Norcross (D-1st Dist.) said he would vote against the deal to curb Iran’s nuclear program for more than a decade in exchange for lifting economic sanctions. Mike Honda of California and Rosa DeLauro of Connecticut came out in favor, with DeLauro declaring, “The best option for preventing Iran from developing a nuclear weapon is to support the agreement”.

The claim comes just weeks before the U.S. Congress votes on whether to reject a nuclear monitoring accord reached between Iran and the five permanent member-states of the United Nations Security Council plus Germany.

House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi declared this week that House Democratic supporters have the votes necessary to sustain Obama’s veto despite unanimous GOP opposition, and the growing list of Democratic endorsements seems to back her up.

The op-ed ran in the home state of a high-ranking Democrat who came out with a fiery critique of the president’s deal.

In a statement, U.S. Sen.

“Put aside the billions we will give back to the ayatollahs to fund terror”. They say the deal should have kept sanctions in place, without explaining why Iran would agree to a deal that provides no benefit to it. The critics have complained that the wider deal is unwisely built on trust of the Iranians. “For the administration to say there is no other deal than this one is an effort to negate Congress’s important role and responsibility”.

There is a path forward should the White House desire an agreement that rests on a sturdier domestic foundation.

Backing the plan “does not make someone anti-Israel”, he said. “They do not compromise our safeguards standards in any way”, Amano said. While I am concerned that numerous key elements expire in the 10-15 year timeframe, our debate must center on whether the deal is preferable to the available alternatives.

Gillibrand said the deal would eliminate every path to a nuclear bomb and the three known nuclear facilities would be monitored daily along with the entire supply chain of nuclear production.

“I wasn’t there”, Stewart said in an email earlier this week.

So, this tough deal that our Secretary of State has negotiated on behalf of our President with Iran doesn’t appear to be as tough as we were originally led to believe. They are not under the sway of the U.S. Congress. They will go ahead.

“[The agreement] didn’t meet the president’s more rigorous objective of anytime, anywhere arrangements”, Hill said.

Lewis stated that Jahn, who is the AP’s Austrian bureau chief, was not a “real reporter” because he did not find out how the IAEA planned to authenticate Iran’s evidence, information that the IAEA typically keeps secret.

U.S. Rep. Rick Crawford, R-Ark., called the Iran self-inspection reports “more than a little bit troubling”.