House Republicans reveal bill to repeal and replace Obama’s healthcare law
Speaker of the House Paul Ryan takes questions from reporters about the American Health Care Act during a news conference on March 7.
For Republicans to meet their commitment to repeal ObamaCare – and to do so in a way that is real, lasting, and substantive – the writers of the American Health Care Act had to closely follow the Senate’s narrow budget reconciliation rules, which strictly limit legislation passed under budget reconciliation.
The GOP plan holds onto some of the more popular elements of the Affordable Care Act, including protecting those with pre-existing conditions and allowing children to stay on parental policies until age 26. Nothing would affect prices and quality of health care as radically as revolutionary innovation, which we’ve seen in other fields, such as information technology.
The bill would offer tax credits, refundable in advance, to people with incomes below $75,000.
“The Republican Party is unified on Obamacare repeal”, Paul said in a statement Thursday. Even though the Affordable Care Act was crafted by congressional Democrats, Republicans slapped the name “Obamacare” on it to pin responsibility for the law on Obama.
Republicans have set an aggressive timetable for moving the bill.
Under the Republicans’ plan, more people would receive the tax credits, but they wouldn’t be as generous as Obamacare subsidies.
One of the most critical aspects of the ACA was that it ensured that psychiatric illnesses were treated with the same attention and medical detail as non-psychiatric illnesses.
So who wins and who loses under the new proposal? Under the GOP plan, it would cap the amount of federal spending.
Some of those critics don’t like the bill because it is not a wholesale repeal of Obamacare.
Medicaid would be converted to block grants to the states, awarded on a per-capita basis and adjusted for inflation. But his intended audience appeared to be fellow Republicans, and he said his party must “actually make good on our word”.
The promises of more reform work by GOP leaders comes as conservative members of Congress, as well as right-leaning health-care analysts and think tanks continue criticizing the pending AHCA bill, which would undo key parts of Obamacare.
First, it would repeal nearly all of the taxes that were increased by the ACA to pay for the expansion of health coverage.
At the same time, the bill would slash taxes for high income earners, including a measure taxing insurance executives who make more than $500,000 annually. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) threw cold water on the House legislation, including the proposed tax credits to help people pay for insurance. “So if you get back more of your own money that’s a tax cut – if you get back somebody else’s money”. It would also restore over-the-counter drugs as eligible for reimbursement from those accounts.
Ryan told his footsoldiers in Congress to gird for battle, as he framed the fight as between the free market and government mandates – which under Obamacare required people to take out health insurance. Before the passage of the ACA, millions of Americans were denied or could not afford to buy health insurance. Among the latest to leave is Humana, one of the nation’s largest health insurers, which announced in February that it will stop selling Obamacare health plans next year for the same reason that others have pulled out of the marketplaces: With so many relatively healthy people avoiding Obamacare plans due to their fast-rising premiums and enormous deductibles, Humana reports that it is losing money on a sicker-than-expected customer mix. But instead, the GOP is going to step in now to try to rescue it before a collapse.
Both the ACA and the House Discussion Draft include tax credits in their approach. The answer is not clear yet.
“I encourage Democrats to work with us to improve the healthcare system for the American people”, he said.
“I am going to be very anxious to hear how we get to 51 votes and how the House gets to 218”, Missouri Sen.
The health care system is enormously complex.