Trump’s budget could impact Meals on Wheels
It is, in many respects, a sort of “greatest hits” compilation of conservative prescriptions for paying for a big defense-spending increase with targeted and general cuts in nondefense discretionary programs – domestic spending that is not in one of the big entitlement programs.
According to Zoe Lawhorn with Tyler Meals on Wheels, tthe money being cut is important.
Women and children who need nutrition assistance might have a harder time accessing it under Trump’s proposal. Federal programmes like the National Endowment for the Arts.
“We would have to not take as many new individuals on to the program and then of course that means that the wait lists would start to grow again”, Elliott said.
In Philadelphia, Meals on Wheels helps feed 6,000 people.
Feeding elderly, mostly homebound Americans wouldn’t appear to be a very controversial program.
Meals on Wheels provides meals and companionship to millions of needy seniors across the country.
Community Development Block Grant program would completely lose its’ $3 billion from the government.
White House budget director Mick Mulvaney said Meals on Wheels is a program that is “not showing any results”. Those hoping that Trump will bring back jobs better hope that he brings back the exact same jobs they already know, because funds for education and job training are gone.
“This is the President’s budget, I’m not sure where the details came from”.
At an afternoon press briefing at the White House, budget director Mick Mulvaney said many states use CDBG money to fund the programs.
While Trump didn’t cut funding for the Agriculture Department’s food safety and inspection service, which looks at things like our meat, chicken, and egg products, another key agency remains uncertain.
The biggest cuts would see the Environmental Protection Agency funding reduced by nearly 30 percent, the State Department and Department of Agriculture cut by 29 percent each, the Department of Health and Human Services – which oversees Medicare and Medicaid – slashed by 23 percent and the Department of Labour funding diminished by 21 percent.
“We’re absolutely reducing funding to the United Nations and to the various foreign aid programs including those run by the United Nations and other agencies”. “There is no long-standing constituency for food safety”.
The plan calls for a $54 billion or 10 percent jump in defense spending as well as a 7 percent increase in spending for the Department of Homeland Security.
Funding will, at least in part, stem from those other programs being slashed in the budget proposal, as well as from American taxpayers.
“What we found is that there were statistically significant differences in health benefits among the three groups”, lead researcher Kali Thomas said, “with the highest gains recognized among participants living alone who had face-to-face contact via daily deliveries”. “If you do, we’ll bring you a meal each day”.