Rep. Nadler to Support Iran Deal After Obama Letter

(4) The world will not take American Presidents as seriously anymore in matters of diplomacy and will diminish our President’s ability to conduct foreign policy. But she has also reserved some ire for members of Congress – presumably on the other side of the aisle – whom she said had chosen knee-jerk opposition to the deal over carefully weighing its pros and cons.

“A better deal can be achieved”, he said.

With so much as stake, the IAEA – after waiting over 10 years to inspect Parchin, speak to Iranian nuclear scientists, and review additional materials and documents – are now told they will not have direct access to Parchin …

Fisher later cited Rauf’s speculations (cautiously) and argued that “monitored inspections” were sufficient for Iran anyway.

The AP report was confirmed by Fox News, and not denied by the UN or the White House.

It provides up to a 24-day delay before Iran is forced to comply with inspections of nuclear sites on their military bases – far from “anywhere, anytime” that the American people were promised.

With majority Republicans unanimously opposed, Obama needs 34 Senate Democrats to sustain his veto of a resolution disapproving the deal.

U.S. Rep. Donald Norcross, who has not seen eye-to-eye with fellow Democratic President Obama on such issues as the Keystone pipeline and the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade agreement, isn’t following his lead on Iran either. (4) The U.S. will be able to work with Iran more closely against IS in Iraq and al-Qaida in Afghanistan.

“Put aside the billions we will give back to the ayatollahs to fund terror”.

And even if this hostile country were to comply with the terms of the deal, Iran will be well positioned in the future to continue its pursuit of a nuclear weapon.

“No one could say Iran showed no flexibility and did not want to solve the problem”.

To guarantee that the deal is approved by Congress, the president launched a campaign in July to rally Democratic support.

However, the IAEA chief made it ckear that the arrangements are technically sound and consistent with the agency’s long-established practices. “They do not compromise our safety standards in any way”.

A White House National Security Council spokesman has said the Obama administration is confident that the United Nations regulatory agency’s agreement is sufficient.

Amir Mohebbian, a political analyst and strategist with close ties to Iran’s leadership, said that though they probably do not realise it, the Republicans are gifting Iran a “get-out” over the nuclear deal.

“The US government’s nuclear experts are confident in the Agency’s technical plans for investigating the possible military dimensions of Iran’s former programme”, he said.

“I wasn’t there”, Stewart said in an email earlier this week.

No leading Republican contender has pledged to stand by the agreement between Iran, the United States and five other world powers. Among the problems are support for terrorism, human rights abuses and threats against regional allies such as Israel, all of which need continued attention from the U.S.

“[The agreement] didn’t meet the president’s more rigorous objective of anytime, anywhere arrangements”, Hill said.

The head of the IAEA Yukiya Amano downplayed the report.

With the Congress voting no, Iran still gets (1) most of its assets unfrozen except those directly under U.S. control.

Iran says its nuclear programme has no military dimensions. Wouldn’t I maybe be a little more assured if I could lift the lid on the cookie jar occasionally just to be sure the cookie consumption rate was only one per day?