Netanyahu anti-Arab drive strain US ties, isolates Israeli: president

If only he could tell us exactly what kind of Iron Dome he plans to provide us with at the moment that Iran’s breakout time – as he said in a radio interview a few months ago – reaches almost zero, in “year 13, 14, 15” of the deal. “But we believe you are wrong”. “And if the rhetoric in these ads and the accompanying commentary sounds familiar, it should, for numerous same people who argued for the war in Iraq are now making the case against the Iranian nuclear deal”.

But the greatest flaw with all of these surveys is that because of their immediate nature, they traded deep examination of communal feelings for instant results, Saxe said. And why should that surprise us, considering that Israel is the only country in the world that Iran wants to destroy? And Iran is actively supporting those who are attacking Israel. 

“I’ve said I would cut spending, and I’ve said exactly where”. “On this particular issue, Israel, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Egypt and the Emirates, we see things the same way”. Israel is not one of those.

I recognize that Prime Minister Netanyahu disagrees, disagrees strongly, I do not doubt his sincerity. “We shouldn’t borrow money from China to send it anywhere, but why don’t we start with eliminating aid to our enemies…” During last summer’s Gaza war, while Hamas rockets were being fired at Israeli cities, including Tel-Aviv, Obama withheld shipments of Hellfire missiles to Israel.

Christie rebutted the Libertarian-Republican candidate. “On this issue, however, I, like other Democrats, have a heartfelt position against the agreement“.

Texas senator Ted Cruz, like Trump, turned the question into a referendum on how Obama handles foreign policy.

And we listened to the opponents, who asserted, inter alia, that this deal at best only delayed but did not dismantle Iran’s nuclear infrastructure; that it in fact created a legitimate pathway for Iran to emerge as a nuclear threshold state even if it never violated the deal; that at least some of Iran’s new infusion of funds would be used to stoke further terror and instability in the Middle East and beyond; that America’s allies in the region were profoundly unsettled by the agreement and its broader implications; and that there were concerns about Iran’s ability to deceive the worldwide community, as it had done in the past at Natanz and Fordow, and as other countries, including North Korea and Syria, had also done.